On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 10:26:01AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Do we want to keep API/ABI stable over the corresponding RHEL release? It would be interesting to have a document that described RH's specs in this area. E.g. which API/ABI are more important that others. RHEL has certainly kept some parts more flexible than others, for example wireless API/ABI on almost each kernel update. It's probably a weighing of pros and cons per case. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp3tJhzmVsjA.pgp
Description: PGP signature