On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 07:05:31AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 05.03.2007 21:37, Axel Thimm wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:09:34AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > >>Axel Thimm wrote: > >>Have I mentioned this is the wrong forum for this discussion? > >Trying to solve this on the Fedora side may take ages > > k, then it might take ages. But I'm strictly against finding special > EPEL solutions for problems, if the same problem exists in Fedora-land > and should be fixed there, too (and this is the case here). Then let's not find special solutions. I'm just against having this kind of special "solution" in EPEL, and I think the majority here has the same opinion. In fact I'm really for using the non-special solution, just plain useradd -r. If the fallback is supposed to had been useradd -r anyway then there was no win to use that special "solution" in the first place. No special solutions, please, I agree - ban fedora-usermgmt from EPEL. > >as no one really seems to be interested (or are you volunteering to > >take the lead). > > Then I'd say the problem can't be that big. That's a joke, right? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpeRJyrTBX1h.pgp
Description: PGP signature