Re: Release and update procedure for EPEL

[Mike McGrath <mmcgrath redhat com>]

Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Ummm. No. I don't think RH still maintains 4. Or 4U1. Or 4U2. So we
> don't either. All updates are going against the latest (misnomed)
> 'quarterly' update. And I don't think that SL does it any different,
> although I might be wrong there. Because every quarterly update is a big
> update set against the previous one (including updates).
>
> So I'm not too sure about what you are talking about.
>
> Cheers,
>   
This is something we can change later.  Lets keep it simple for now and 
if an issue comes up we can discuss it as a real example instead of 
guessing what problems will come up.  The releases are just a snapshot 
of the rolling updates at some point in time.  Its pretty arbitrary AFAIK.

   -Mike