On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:31:52PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:58:10PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > The current discussion about fedora-usermgr is an example of most > > probably a bad choice in Fedora which stalls EPEL. > > The fact that it is a bad choice is your opinion. There is a "probably" in my sentence above to show that there are a few people on this list that seem to not hate fedora-usermgr. Note that the issue started with a collective "I have fedora-usermgr, too" thread here. If it were a pure personal view my wording would had been much more stronger ;) > And I can't see why it stalls EPEL. It could also be considered that > it is the opposition to fedora-usermgr that stalls EPEL. Check the thread. After identifying that fedora-usermgr is not liked by "probably" the majority around here it the issue was "escalated" to be handled "upstream" in Fedora. If we had a quick voting here, we'd be past this issue by now, while now we're waiting on something to happen in Fedora-land. That's what I mean by being stalled. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp3nZ59GTp3F.pgp
Description: PGP signature