[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Repotag
- From: Dag Wieers <dag wieers com>
- To: EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Repotag
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:25:03 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Dag Wieers wrote:
> > If I hadn't a repotag, my nagios-packages would be numbered the same as the
> > EPEL packages. Including the same release tag. If people then have problems,
> > nobody could tell from the output whether this was an EPEL, non-EPEL,
> > RPMforge or other package.
>
> I can think of a couple ways to figure this out, none of which are very
> difficult. Buildhost, vendor, packager, and key signature come to mind.
You can't tell all that from a posting on a forum. The problem is not that
you can get that information from somewhere, the problem is that you have
to have more communication via email/forums to get that information.
> > This is an EPEL issue, not a Fedora issue. Why could there not be a rule
> > that says Fedora packages do not have a repotag, but EPEL packages will ?
>
> Because its just one more thing to maintain/change/whatever that so far has
> only one supporter.
Fine, RPMforge will be dropping the repotag as well.
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, dag wieers com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]