On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:56:03PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Axel Thimm schrieb: > >On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:27:30PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >>Rex Dieter wrote: > >> > >>>No Package Found for sqlite-devel > >>OK, now it's not finding sqlite-devel for el4/x86_64 too. > >>http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-4-epel/30483-qt4-4.2.3-6.el4.3/x86_64/root.log > >> > >>All I know, is that sqlite (and sqlite-devel) *is* there in centos4 > >>(4.4, i386/x86_64 anyway). If our (rh)el4 buildsys doesn't include > >>sqlite, where did centos4 get it from? > > > >There is no sqlite in RHEL4 > > Likely, but I don't have a tree at hand to test. > > >or RHEL5. > > Wrong afaics; Sorry that was a typo, it should be RHEL3. Anyway here are the builds I'm using since Aug 2006 for RHEL4 and RHEL3: http://atrpms.net/name/sqlite/ For RHEL5 I'm using what RHEL5 ships, of course. RHEL5 ships 3.3.6-2, ATrpms' RHEL4/5 3.1.2-2.99_2 (a side-port from FC's 3.1.2-3, the 2.99 is intended to be lesses than 3). I checked Dag, but he's not shipping any sqlite fro RHEL, not sure where Rex picked sqlite at CentOS. So if EPEL4/3 will build sqlite it would be best to be between 3.1.2-3 and 3.3.6-2 to accomodate for RHEL5 and ATrpms. Rex, which version of sqlite did you get on CentOS4? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpwRakVc83B6.pgp
Description: PGP signature