On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:29:05PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Now that I've thought about it some more I don't like that plan that > much anymore, as then it's not possible to differentiate if people have > the old or the new package installed. Sure, that shouldn't be many > people yet, but nevertheless it could create problems. The reason for not doing so were that one would fork all specfiles. > Opinions? Just ignore that? Or simply do a script-build mass rebuild of > EPEL5 with increased %release? I'd say ignore it. The current users of EPEL are on this list. We'll have also other issues to resolve (like qt4 on EPEL4 > qt4 on RHEL5, and if we check we'll probably find more) and we need to keep a rawhide attitude (aka flexibility) otherwise we'll have to start using epochs before launching. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpejtYJTquXo.pgp
Description: PGP signature