[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
testing -stable move (was: Re: Fedora EPEL Package Build Report 2007-10-28)
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info>
- To: EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: testing -stable move (was: Re: Fedora EPEL Package Build Report 2007-10-28)
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:58:06 +0100
On 28.10.2007 14:28, buildsys fedoraproject org wrote:
> Packages built and released for Fedora EPEL 5: 268
>
> NEW abcde-2.3.99.6-3.el5 : A Better CD Encoder
> abcde-2.3.99.6-4.el5
> NEW aget-0.4-3.el5 : Console download accelerator
> amtterm-0.5-1.el5
> amtterm-1.0-1.el5
> arj-3.10.22-3.el5
> NEW aspell-sk-0.52-3.el5 : Slovak dictionaries for Aspell
> audio-entropyd-1.0.0-4.el5.2
> NEW awstats-6.7-1.el5 : Advanced Web Statistics
> [...]
You might have guest from the amount of packages listed in the report:
a lot of packages were moved from testing/5/ to the proper epel5 repos.
I excluded some:
- all those packages that have broken deps (I hope nothing slipped
through; does anybody want to recheck?)
- all those packages that entered EPEL for the first time in the past days
- yum-cron, for now, in the hope to find a way that makes both EPEL and
CentOS happy
If anybody wonders how it did it here is how:
* download all packages for i386 locally
* move all the new stuff and yum-cron away
* run repoclosure
* move everything with broken deps away
* run repoclosure again
* move some now broken deps away
* repo was sane then according to repoclosure
Then I took the list of SRPMs from the packages and feed that to the
"ToStable" script from the EPEL push scripts.
Not perfect, but worked afaics.
Cu
knurd
Cu
knurd
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]