[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: permission to use spec files in other projects (Was Re: clamav)
- From: Dag Wieers <dag wieers com>
- To: EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-advisory-board redhat com
- Subject: Re: permission to use spec files in other projects (Was Re: clamav)
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:42:47 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:05:44AM -0400, Max Spevack wrote:
> > What is the decision that you are looking for here, Thorsten? A
> > statement that the Fedora spec files are just as redistributable as all
> > the rest of our source code (ie: that the spec files are GPL'd just like
> > the source?)
>
> I think the right thing to do is to make sure spec files are always such
> that they have no more restrictions than the upstream code that they build
> (even if the upstream license allows relicensing in a more strict way).
>
> In fact, I'd really like to encourage spec-files-as-public-domain.
Me too. I cannot see much value in SPEC files and 2 persons can end up
making the exact SPEC file.
What is required to make something public domain ? Is it sufficient to add
a file in a directory, or do I need to add a line on top ?
If so, I have no problem to put that information in every SPEC file.
--
-- dag wieers, dag wieers com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]