On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:15:40 -0500 Christopher Blunck <chris zenoss com> wrote: > What is the next logical step in the progression towards our > inclusion in the EPEL repository? We're very excited about becoming > official members of your community and would like to know what we > need to do to be included in your group. Honestly I would work on an EPEL4 (RHEL4) set of specs, that use the RHEL4 provided python-2.3. I don't think anything that requires python-2.4 will be allowed in the EPEL5 repo. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature