[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: BUG: clamav packages badly broken



On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:23:28 +0100
bugs michael gmx net (Michael Schwendt) wrote:

> ...snipp...
> So, please start filing
> tickets, point out your concerns, get status updates from the
> maintainer, ...

An excellent plan. I filed: 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427103
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427104
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427105

To start with. 

Will see what the maintainer says on those. 

I think another thing that doesn't help here is that several of the
CLOSED->WONTFIX bugs against clamav refer readers to the fedora.us
bugzilla instance for reasoning, but that is no longer available. 

There are 15 closed->NOTABUG and 6 closed->WONTFIX bugs against clamav,
which I think is an indicator that users are confused by the packaging
and/or find it non intuitive. 

In any case, I think we should try and be constructive here. 
If anyone has other issues, please file them. If folks are seeing the
same above issues I am seeing and would like them fixed, please add
your comments to the above bugs. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]