Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 15.01.2008 20:01, Rahul Sundaram wrote:Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:CLA is not just a contract between A and B or more specifically it allows the same rights to all recipients which in this case would include C. I believe spot already explained that inOn 15.01.2008 19:23, Dennis Gilmore wrote:On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:No one but you sees a problem. It's covered by the CLA.On 15.01.2008 19:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:/topic EPEL SIG Meeting | permission to use spec files in other projects | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/MiscDoes anybody still care? Seems the Board either do not understand what we/I'm up to or they ignore it.Please explain to me: What meaning has the CLA (a contract between a Fedora contributer and Fedora/Red Hat) to someone else that receives software from Fedora? I'm not familiar with US law, but in Germany a contract between A and B has no meaning to C.https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-January/msg00031.htmlWhich I replied to in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-January/msg00032.html with the words: [...] I can't know if the all work I get from Fedora was submitted by someone that signed the CLA. [...]
All the work definitely isn't but spec files would be. That is the only thing you are worried about. Right?
Rahul