On 07/20/2008 03:39 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote:
A couple of months ago I wanted to install bugzilla from EL-4 but I found out that a bunch of perl modules were missing (actually bugzilla needed one module which in turn needed others and via a looooooooooooong dependency chain I ended up building 13 packages which were missing at the time from EL-4). In the end I was stuck because a certain feature (really, I do not remember which one :( ) was provided by perl-5.8.8 but not by the stock perl [-5.8.5] which is provided by Centos 4. Comparing my internal repo with the list from http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/perl/ I notice that I have successfully built perl-Image-Size-3.1-3, perl-Text-Autoformat-1.14.0-3 and perl-Text-Reform-1.12.2-5. All of them seem to have been built cleanly, except for the last one for which I have disabled %check (the entry I have added to the changelog at the time says " all tests fail due to missing version.pm"). So here comes issue number 1: if someone with more knowledge in perl can verify my packages, I can happily provide them (so as to save the building time) and if they are OK, could we bump the EPEL versions ? Issue number 2: AFAIK, perl-5.8.8 is NOT available in the stock distro but from the more advanced Application Stack. Am I wrong here ?//After the last meeting, I was tasked with finding out what was missing in terms of Perl package in EPEL. Thanks to cweyl and some discussion on #fedora-devel we now have a report that is amazing. http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/perl/ Again, thanks to cweyl for the wicked-good layout of this report. Now it's time for some analysis of the data and to see what we can do to get more packages into EPEL.
wolfy (who has just come back from vacation)
PS: Who is the person responsible with building the report (Chris ?) ?
It's a nice piece of work but it needs a bit of fixing, since some
modules which are available in F-9/rawhide are obviously missing from
the list. Starting with perl itself...