Perl Report
Manuel Wolfshant
wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro
Sun Jul 20 01:12:13 UTC 2008
On 07/20/2008 03:39 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> After the last meeting, I was tasked with finding out what was missing
> in terms of Perl package in EPEL.
>
> Thanks to cweyl and some discussion on #fedora-devel we now have a
> report that is amazing.
>
> http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/perl/
>
> Again, thanks to cweyl for the wicked-good layout of this report.
>
>
> Now it's time for some analysis of the data and to see what we can do
> to get more packages into EPEL.
>
>
A couple of months ago I wanted to install bugzilla from EL-4 but I
found out that a bunch of perl modules were missing (actually bugzilla
needed one module which in turn needed others and via a looooooooooooong
dependency chain I ended up building 13 packages which were missing at
the time from EL-4). In the end I was stuck because a certain feature
(really, I do not remember which one :( ) was provided by perl-5.8.8 but
not by the stock perl [-5.8.5] which is provided by Centos 4.
Comparing my internal repo with the list from
http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/perl/ I notice that I have
successfully built perl-Image-Size-3.1-3, perl-Text-Autoformat-1.14.0-3
and perl-Text-Reform-1.12.2-5. All of them seem to have been built
cleanly, except for the last one for which I have disabled %check (the
entry I have added to the changelog at the time says " all tests fail
due to missing version.pm").
So here comes issue number 1: if someone with more knowledge in perl
can verify my packages, I can happily provide them (so as to save the
building time) and if they are OK, could we bump the EPEL versions ?
Issue number 2: AFAIK, perl-5.8.8 is NOT available in the stock
distro but from the more advanced Application Stack. Am I wrong here ?//
wolfy (who has just come back from vacation)
PS: Who is the person responsible with building the report (Chris ?) ?
It's a nice piece of work but it needs a bit of fixing, since some
modules which are available in F-9/rawhide are obviously missing from
the list. Starting with perl itself...
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list