[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: 5.1 -> 5.2 move
- From: "Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge gmail com>
- To: "EPEL development disccusion" <epel-devel-list redhat com>, "Patrice Dumas" <pertusus free fr>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: 5.1 -> 5.2 move
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 12:10:56 -0600
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 04:13:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Johnny Hughes (mailing-lists hughesjr com) said:
>> > OK ... I have created a package that conflicts with gtkhtml3 < 3.12.1
>> >
>> > we will be putting it in centos-5.2 extras (after it goes through the
>> > centos QA process).
>> >
>> > Here are testing RPMS:
>> >
>> > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/compat-gtkhtml38/
>> >
>> > This was tested with gnucash and mysql-query-browser and it seemed to work
>> > OK with the new gtkhtml3 installed as well.
>>
>> Why do this instead of EPEL?
>
> Because it is forbidden in EPEL. This clearly should be in RHEL proper.
>
> --
I don't see why it is forbidden in EPEL. I see it as being something
we haven't dealt with before... but I remember a couple of early
packages that we stuck in EPEL first then RHEL took up because it
fixed broken things.. or maybe that was CentOS doing it first. Either
case, I just want the user to not be borked.
> Pat
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]