[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: 5.1 -> 5.2 move



On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com> wrote:
> Patrice Dumas (pertusus free fr) said:
>> > I don't see why it is forbidden in EPEL. I see it as being something
>> > we haven't dealt with before... but I remember a couple of early
>> > packages that we stuck in EPEL first then RHEL took up because it
>> > fixed broken things.. or maybe that was CentOS doing it first. Either
>> > case, I just want the user to not be borked.
>>
>> Conflict with RHEL packages is not allowed.
>
> It was discussed at one point to add gtkhtml38 to 5.2, but it was
> decided against it with the idea of putting it in EPEL. Given that, I don't
> see how this would be an issue.
>
Could we get a direct dialog with the RHEL steering committee (or
whatever the governing body is) on this?


> In any case, I'm pretty sure RHEL product people know where to find me.
> Building...
>
> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]