Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-06-29

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazqueznet at gmail.com
Mon Jun 30 00:10:59 UTC 2008


On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 15:08 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> 2008/6/29 Till Maas <opensource at till.name>:
> > On Sun June 29 2008, Christopher Stone wrote:
> >
> >> This is the third time I have tried to get some kind of response on this.
> >>
> >> Is there any way to stop this spam???
> >
> > There was a response in:
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-June/msg00164.html
> >
> > You need to get your package removed by the epel signers and rebuild it once
> > the dependencies are there.
> 
> Ah, somehow I missed that reply.  So, can we do this?  Is there a
> special e-mail for epel signers?  When will epel5.2 be a part of the
> build system?  Why isnt the build system up to date?

I believe they were originally holding out for CentOS 5.2. But it's now
out, so it's just a matter of priorities.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20080629/3ef26910/attachment.sig>


More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list