Wiki Pages that need love

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Tue Oct 14 18:24:10 UTC 2008


On 14.10.2008 20:03, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 14.10.2008 17:49, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:51:33PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>>> database all the maintainers that maintain at least one EL branch. I'll
>>>> mail Toshio to ask whether it is possible. And the text on this page
>>>> should certainly be shortened.
>>> Toshio kindly answered me. Currently there is no url that can be used
>>> for that, but he did a simple script to get that information.
>>>
>>> The script is here:
>>> http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/pkgdb/id_to_owner.py
>>>
>>> The result is here:
>>> http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/pkgdb/epel-owner.txt
>> /me takes a quick look.
>>
>> The list contains corsepiu, which according to
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo
>> doesn't want to be a EPEL Contributer
> He's listed as owner for perl-Test-Taint and perl-Params-Validate in
> EPEL-4. 

Ahh, that explains it.

> I was unable to track down the request for the EPEL branches in
> bugzilla (they aren't on the review request) but I do see that rmyers is
> the owner of the EL-5 branches. 

I remember that corsepiu once accidentally was assigned as owner for a 
few epel packages. Maybe that (without purpose) was not fixed properly?

> Perhaps he wants the EL-4 branches as well?

Rob CCed.

>> and according to
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugzilla?tg_format=plain
>> is not maintaining any packages in EPEL directly. Maybe he's
>> co-maintainer somewhere to make sure he sees commits, but the script did
>> not catch that.
> This is actually because of how bugzilla works combined with the way we
> create that set of acls.  For Fedora, the devel owner is used to
> determine who to use as owner in bugzilla.  For EPEL, the EL-5 owner is
> used.

Ahh, that explains it. Thx for tracking this down.

Cu
knurd




More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list