[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: R2.9.0 in testing, texlive dependancies
- From: Bryan Hepworth <bryan hepworth newcastle ac uk>
- To: "'EPEL development disccusion'" <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: R2.9.0 in testing, texlive dependancies
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:37:40 +0100
>-----Original Message-----
>From: epel-devel-list-bounces redhat com
>[mailto:epel-devel-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Tom
>"spot" Callaway
>Sent: 29 April 2009 21:26
>To: EPEL development disccusion
>Subject: Re: R2.9.0 in testing, texlive dependancies
>
>On 04/29/2009 03:23 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On 04/29/2009 04:04 AM, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> First off if this is the wrong place to post I'll apologise
>in advance.
>>>
>>> I tried the installation of R2.9.0 a quick try and noticed
>it has dependancies on the newer texlive packages. Are there
>any plans to get these across into EPEL also? I could only see
>them listed in the later fedora 11 testing release.
>>
>> Grr, that's not right. Let me go fix that.
>
>Everything should now be fixed in the 1.el4.1 and 1.el5.1
>builds I just kicked off.
>
>~spot
Tom
Cheers for that, I'll give it another whirl in the morning.
Not wanting to push my luck *too* far, I also noticed it was looking for vi - I was oblivious to the fact that the vi I always fire up is infact vim. I couldn't find a vi package in rhel5 to address this one..
Thanks
Bry
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]