[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Recent RPM retention in the EPEL repos

From: Michael Stahnke <mastahnke gmail com>
To: EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: Recent RPM retention in the EPEL repos
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:55:02 -0600

I completely agree.  I thought we did keep 1 version back, but perhaps
I am wrong on that.
+1 on making this an official stance for keeping at minimum 1 previous version.

Is this difficult to change from a technical perspective?

stahnma

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recent RPM retention in the EPEL repos
  - From: Howard Johnson
- Re: Recent RPM retention in the EPEL repos
  - From: Jesse Keating

References:
- Recent RPM retention in the EPEL repos
  - From: inode0

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]