[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: python-iniparse should not be in EPEL5



On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 09:04 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> "Not the first time" for this precise package? Or was that a more 
> general comment?

General comment. AFAIK, this has previously happened to perl-Date-Manip
and perl-Net-Telnet.

> I'd actually say the push scripts are the wrong place -- a script IMHO 
> should watch CVS and yell as soon as a EPEL branch for a regular EL 
> package is created.

Makes sense. I'll have a go at it as soon as real-life-thingies allows.
Unless someone gets to it before me that is (-: 

-- 
David Juran
Sr. Consultant
Red Hat
+358-504-146348

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]