On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 09:04 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > "Not the first time" for this precise package? Or was that a more > general comment? General comment. AFAIK, this has previously happened to perl-Date-Manip and perl-Net-Telnet. > I'd actually say the push scripts are the wrong place -- a script IMHO > should watch CVS and yell as soon as a EPEL branch for a regular EL > package is created. Makes sense. I'll have a go at it as soon as real-life-thingies allows. Unless someone gets to it before me that is (-: -- David Juran Sr. Consultant Red Hat +358-504-146348
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part