pexepct is in RHEL and should be dropped from EPEL

[Rahul Sundaram]

Robert Scheck wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> I agree on coordination however re-using a spec cannot be called  
>> stealing by any means.
> 
> How else would you call stealing then? 

A permissively licensed spec file being reused is not stealing and is a 
very good thing. It is absolutely the right thing to do instead of 
wasting time reinventing in a perfectly good package. Nothing to do with 
software distribution should ever be called stealing. That just plays 
into the hands of proprietary software companies which deliberately 
confuse things. This has nothing to do with who sponsors what or the 
otherwise valuable pressure to coordinate better.

It would be good to document best practises when spec files are reused 
in RHEL as is going to happen repeatedly so that both sides understand 
what is to be done. Someone interested in not seeing things like this 
should volunteer.

Rahul