On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > It would be good to document best practises when spec files are reused > in RHEL as is going to happen repeatedly so that both sides understand > what is to be done. Someone interested in not seeing things like this > should volunteer. Best practise is, if packagers would know, how packaging and ENVRA works - which seems not known to all packagers (independent whether Fedora or Red Hat at this case). My previous e-mail explains correct, why not bumping release of ENVRA is broken in such a case (which also would automagically cause %changelog to get silent rpmlint) and why it has to be fixed by Red Hat and why we at EPEL can't fix or solve it completely. So if somebody does not understand that, he/she shouldn't be a RPM packager at all, sorry. Greetings, Robert
Attachment:
pgpUfdIZUU6zE.pgp
Description: PGP signature