[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Recent Upgrade to Bugzilla 3.2.4
- From: Christian Nolte <ch nolte noltec org>
- To: EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Recent Upgrade to Bugzilla 3.2.4
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:04:32 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Xavier Bachelot schrieb:
>> the 3.0.2 version have alot of security issues.
>>
>> you should wast some time upgrading
>>
>> if you need help contact me at google talk or skype
>>
> The problem is not about wasting some time upgrading, even if you kindly
> provide online support :-) It's about silently breaking a previously
> working setup. The EPEL policy says update without a transparent upgrade
> path should be avoided by all means and that security fixes should
> preferably be backported. Granted, this is not always possible, but then,
> the incompatible update should at least be advertised on the epel-announce
> list, possibly with hints on how to ease the transition. At least, that's
> my understanding of the policy.
Yes. I absolutely second that!
Thanks for the kind offer for help, though. I did manage to upgrade the
installation.
- --
"He's a world-famous shark-wrestling astronaut gone bad. She's a
psychotic cat-loving vampire with a knack for trouble. They fight
crime!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkpfQYAACgkQCNjA0nfhW7woKACg2vLKuBU2hgz+BcrJYCef59og
I2cAoP9BkCcmHs7lMRVMWGltRHpYs7GT
=1lWV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]