[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Nagios upgrade



On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 14:11 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Do we want nagios to be upgraded to 3.0?   The 2.x branch is still being
> maintained upstream and we're still using it in Fedora.  There would be a
> requirement to change some of the config files, but nothing horrible.

It could always be package labeled as "nagios3" for now, and co-exist
with "nagios" (2.x) until 2.x is no longer developed upstream.  Just a
suggestion.


-- 
Bryan J Smith     Senior Consultant    Red Hat GPS SE US
mailto:bjs redhat com         +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) 
mailto:b j smith ieee org     (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) 
-------------------------------------------------------- 
You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100%
no-IP-strings-attached, community software development.
But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other
software and services firms for their own, direct needs? 
It's no comparison:  http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]