Nagios upgrade

[Adam Miller]

I like that idea. While I do think its cool to run updates and be
pleasantly surprised by brand new versions of software, I can see how
some people might not be so receptive in an enterprise environment.

-Adam

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Bryan J Smith <bjs at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 14:11 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> Do we want nagios to be upgraded to 3.0?   The 2.x branch is still being
>> maintained upstream and we're still using it in Fedora.  There would be a
>> requirement to change some of the config files, but nothing horrible.
>
> It could always be package labeled as "nagios3" for now, and co-exist
> with "nagios" (2.x) until 2.x is no longer developed upstream.  Just a
> suggestion.
>
>
> --
> Bryan J Smith     Senior Consultant    Red Hat GPS SE US
> mailto:bjs at redhat.com         +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile)
> mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org     (non-RH/ext to Blackberry)
> --------------------------------------------------------
> You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100%
> no-IP-strings-attached, community software development.
> But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other
> software and services firms for their own, direct needs?
> It's no comparison:  http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>



-- 
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
---------------------------------------------------------
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments