[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Question of IBM PowerPC support
- From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org>
- To: maynardj us ibm com, EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Question of IBM PowerPC support
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:04:00 +0530
On 11/20/2009 01:59 AM, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> Hello EPEL community,
> I'm considering going through the steps of getting a Fedora package I
> maintain into EPEL. This package is currently very arch-specific as
> it's used for collecting instruction trace data to feed into a timer
> accurate simulator. The architecture in question is IBM PowerPC. Since
> Fedora has demoted ppc/ppc64 from being a primary arch (starting with
> F13), I'm wondering what effect (if any) that decision has on ppc/ppc64
> packages in EPEL. I will want to target this package to RHEL 5 and
> (when available) RHEL 6. Are there any problems or issues I should know
> about?
None afaik. What EPEL supports is different from what Fedora supports.
Rahul
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]