New git in EPEL?

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Oct 28 17:31:43 UTC 2009


On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:30 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> If we're going to violate policy, why exactly do we have one to begin
> with?

Would it really be a policy break if the old command paths were
retained?  AFAIK the removal of the git-* commands from /usr/bin was the
only real 'break' between the versions, and if those are retained than
it should be an acceptable upgrade.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20091028/0677192c/attachment.sig>


More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list