On 02/08/10 16:02, Mark Chappell wrote:
Mark Chappell wrote:Iain Arnell wrote:The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of orphaned rpms.Indeed, a branch request is in.Or not, It's perl-MIME-Types I requested....
OK, I raised it as http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620459 Paul.