[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Broken dependencies: netcdf (gcc-gfortran(x86-32))
- From: Jussi Lehtola <jussilehtola fedoraproject org>
- To: epel-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Broken dependencies: netcdf (gcc-gfortran(x86-32))
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:32:51 +0200
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:20:49 -0700
Orion Poplawski <orion cora nwra com> wrote:
> On 12/13/2010 11:04 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 12/13/2010 09:24 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:47:54 -0700
> >> Orion Poplawski<orion cora nwra com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ah, I didn't catch the multilib aspect (32-bit missing on x86_64).
> >>> So, this needs to be fixed in the EPEL multilib compose?
> >>
> >> It can't be. It's the way it is in the rhel repos. We could copy
> >> and re-create the rhel repos, but thats not something I think we
> >> want to do.
> >>
> >> kevin
> >
> > What I meant was - could we exclude items that require
> > gcc-gfortran(x86-32) from the EPEL x86_64 repos?
> >
>
> Does anyone know how I/we can fix this?
Drop the Requires: gcc-gfortran%{_isa} and it will work.
Maybe someone should mention this in the guidelines; this won't work on
any Fedora or RHEL until x86_64 gfortran is made to provide
gcc-gfortran(x86-32)... [Although I don't know if 64-bit gfortran ran
with -m32 produces the same modules as 32-bit gfortran]
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola fedoraproject org
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]