On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:47:42 +0100 Till Maas <opensource till name> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:14:06AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > A big / problematic difference is, that in EPEL the owner / state of > the tickets are not changed if someone processes then. Therefore it > seems not possible to query trac for unhandled trac requests. For > Fedora there is a nice RSS feed for all unhandled koji issues. But > there seems to be no way to get one for all tickets that do not have > any comments. I suppose we could start reassigning them too... the downside there is that if the person who did the tag is busy/gone, further requests or issues in the ticket may be unnoticed by active taggers that could be handling it. > > If you would like to start doing them I have no objections. > > So in case there will be another ticket for both Fedora and EPEL, does > there need to be a seperate ticket in the EPEL component to track it > or can I just track it in the Fedora ticket? I would think just one ticket would be fine. The fewer tickets the better IMHO. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature