Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel

[Jon Stanley <jonstanley gmail com>]

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Adam Miller
<maxamillion fedoraproject org> wrote:
> The reason I wanted to bring this up is that we say in our policy that
> we do not ship packages that are shipped by RedHat in RHEL. But this
> being a subscription channel that is not extremely popular, do we want
> to revise that policy to say that we don't ship packages that are not
> in the base channel of desktop/workstation/server/ap as those are the
> most common or do we want to stick to the current policy quite
> strictly?

In what context was it brought up? I'm inclined to think that we just
go with Base/Virt/Clustering/ClusterStorage (the things you get with
AP).  We already ship 389 in EPEL, which is the upstream for RHDS. I
don't really see nagios as being any different.

On another note, Nagios for monitoring HPC deployments? Seriously? :)