Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel

[Adam Miller <maxamillion fedoraproject org>]

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Jon Stanley <jonstanley gmail com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Adam Miller
> <maxamillion fedoraproject org> wrote:
>> The reason I wanted to bring this up is that we say in our policy that
>> we do not ship packages that are shipped by RedHat in RHEL. But this
>> being a subscription channel that is not extremely popular, do we want
>> to revise that policy to say that we don't ship packages that are not
>> in the base channel of desktop/workstation/server/ap as those are the
>> most common or do we want to stick to the current policy quite
>> strictly?
>
> In what context was it brought up? I'm inclined to think that we just
> go with Base/Virt/Clustering/ClusterStorage (the things you get with
> AP).  We already ship 389 in EPEL, which is the upstream for RHDS. I
> don't really see nagios as being any different.
>

Honestly not sure, I came in half way through the conversation trying
to defend EPEL for not shipping (or should not be shipping) something
that RedHat does already.

> On another note, Nagios for monitoring HPC deployments? Seriously? :)

Agreed, I'd go ganglia.

>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>

-AdamM

-- 
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
---------------------------------------------------------
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments