[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- From: Stephen John Smoogen <smooge gmail com>
- To: EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:49:46 -0700
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Steve Traylen <steve traylen cern ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke gmail com> wrote:
>>>>> Do we stick to our policy as is or do we want to make a revision?
>
> Just to check these extra channels with nagios in for instance are not available
> from CentOS or similar are they? Moving to an expected base below EPEL that
> is bigger than CentOS will surly create a problem for many people.
>
No they are not available in the base channels of CentOS. To be
honest, I think those are the 'channels' we should stick to for
checking what is in or not in EPEL. It leads to other logic loops but
for the most part we can agree that is a good base to look at.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning
- References:
- nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]