Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel

[Stephen John Smoogen <smooge gmail com>]

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Adam Miller
<maxamillion fedoraproject org> wrote:
> Here's a proposal:
>
> Let's make an alteration to our current policy to something of the
> effect that "we do not ship any package that has an openly available
> RPM/SRPM located in any child directory of
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/ but we are unable to
> verify that there will be no conflicts as not all channels are
> published."
>
> Beyond that I don't think there is any realistic expectation of us to
> know what we could potentially conflict with if the information is not
> publicly available.
>
> -AdamM

"EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace
packages in RHEL or layered products."

to

"EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace
packages in RHEL. [Package conflicts are determined by what is openly
available from Red Hat's tree (currently located at
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/) ]

> --
> http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
> /\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning