[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel



On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:21 PM, inode0 <inode0 gmail com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge gmail com> wrote:
>> "EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace
>> packages in RHEL or layered products."
>>
>> to
>>
>> "EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace
>> packages in RHEL. [Package conflicts are determined by what is openly
>> available from Red Hat's tree (currently located at
>> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/) ]
>
> I would appreciate you putting up with one more serious question from
> the perspective of a user. Since RHEIPA, RHSAT, RHDirServ, RHCERT,
> RHWAS, and more fall into this new category and since the upstream
> versions of many of those have been suggested as desirable targets for
> inclusion in EPEL can you help me understand what a package conflict
> means in this case? Is it a conflict at the package level? Is it a
> conflict at the file level?

I am not sure what you mean fall into this new category. None of the
channels listed above seem to be in
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/ [Nor are some of
them on ftp://ftp.redhat.com/ in a form that could be used to build
file/package conflicts from.]

Could you define it a bit better for me?



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]