[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- From: Stephen John Smoogen <smooge gmail com>
- To: EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:11:33 -0700
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:41:00AM -0800, Christopher wrote:
>> Possibly RH could use a one-higher Epoch in their channels. Everybody
>> wins.
>
> That's the path of madness. Let's please not encourage it.
>
We also checked and rpm doesn't allow us to use an EPOCH of -1 (for
even more madness).
I think in the end, we are going to either rebuild what they have in
that channel OR not ship it. Joy.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning
- References:
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
- Re: nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]