On Thursday 14 January 2010 07:01:37 pm Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin tummy com> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:21:31 -0700 > > > > Stephen John Smoogen <smooge gmail com> wrote: > >> Ok there are 76 direct conflicts between RH sub-channels and EPEL > > > > Which sub-channels exactly? Packages in satellite, directory server, and certificate system are expected to possibly cause conflicts. the open source equivilent are branded under diferent product names and are undergoing work explictly to get them into epel. I know i personally pulled a bunch of the packages from epel to put into satellite and if we pull them from epel i would be extremely disappointed. In the satellite case you only have a supported satellite server if you use software from the rhn channels adding epel to a satellite box will immediately make you unsupported. Dennis > Everything with src.rpms under > ftp://ftp.redhat.com//redhat/linux/enterprise [5 I need to look at 4 > also] > > JBWFK > RHCERT > RHDirServ > RHEIPA > RHEMRG > RHNPROXY > RHNSAT > RHWAS > > I would expect there are other channels that I am not aware of ... but > these are the ones that people can replicate tests from. > > > kevin > > > > _______________________________________________ > > epel-devel-list mailing list > > epel-devel-list redhat com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.