On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 08:20 -0600, Adam Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:06 AM, David Juran <djuran redhat com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 21:21 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a badger gmail com> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:21:31PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > I think we've been through this before, but if EPEL would ship the same > > version that Red Hat does of the layered products then there wouldn't be > > any conflict for those who have the layered product and the one's who do > > have the layered product can still enjoy the package. Or am I missing > > something here? > > > > It would conflict because you have essentially the same package, same > version, same release, etc. but from two different sources. Sorry, what I meant was that the release number should be lower in EPEL. I.e. the EPEL package would be identical to the RHEL one except that the release number would be lower. -- David Juran Sr. Consultant Red Hat +358-504-146348
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part