Request for policy clarification

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:35:09AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 11:30 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > With a package you have a lot more garbage to maintain - with just
> > > adding the dep you can phase it out in an update and not have to add any
> > > obsoletes or conflicts garbage.
> > > 
> > This argument could be used for every compat package in Fedora as well,
> > though.  Why don't we ship the openssl compat package and the main openssl
> > packages from a single srpm?
> 
> B/c the openssl items are not on a horizon that is as a short as
> 6months.
> 
I don't understand this phrasing.  Could you restate?

> This problem goes away when samba3x gets fixed.
> 
>
Yes, in RHEL-5.6 IIUC and it goes as planned.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20100616/7039e9ae/attachment.sig>