[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Packages for EL-6 (or lack thereof)



On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Mark Chappell <tremble tremble org uk> wrote:
> Subsequent to the last EPEL meeting I've tried to pull out some info on
> which packages have and have not been built so far...
>
> Note: Originally there was no plan for an automated mass re-build
>
> Out of almost 3500 packages, about 500 have been built.
>
> A list of what's been built or not, who's packages haven't been built
> and what the latest builds are can be found at:
>
> http://tremble.fedorapeople.org/EPEL-Report
>
> The top 10 for unbuilt packages:
>
> spot : 197
> lkundrak : 153
> steve : 141
> orphan : 126
> thias : 88
> rdieter : 80
> lmacken : 67
> rjones : 62
> xulchris : 59
> kwizart : 56
>
> The 10 ten for packages built:
>
> ellert : 54
> tremble : 50
> remi : 49
> robert : 43
> ausil : 42
> pghmcfc : 41
> peter : 38
> stevetraylen : 27
> itamarjp : 25
> sharkcz : 21
>
>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>
Some of the packages on your list were pulled into core RHEL.  I know
rails and it's deps were.  Thus, I have not built them for EPEL-6.

stahnma


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]