On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 18:54 +0000, Trevor Hemsley wrote: > Without wishing to reopen a can of worms, this should be an interesting > test of the recently revised EPEL policy on duplicating RH packages > since these are already in RHEMRG. e.g. > > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/condor-7.4.1-0.7.1.el5.src.rpm Indeed, it's a can of worms... In this case both rawhide and F12 has condor-7.4.1-1 and also RHEL has the 7.4.1 version so that shouldn't be much of a problem. But I think a lot of trouble can be avoided if the version pushed to EPEL would have a release number _lower_ then -0.7.1. -- David Juran Sr. Consultant Red Hat +358-504-146348
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part