[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Packages where EPEL beats EL
- From: Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>
- To: EPEL development disccusion <epel-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Packages where EPEL beats EL
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:55:18 -0600
Once upon a time, Mark Chappell <tremble tremble org uk> said:
> The important question would I suppose be what does RPM/Yum do with them...
>
> I've a nasty feeling it uses lapack by default, but will use atlas for
> dep solving if it's already installed.
Shortest name wins, so atlas gets pulled in (when it doesn't actually
meet a needed dependency). I would think the bug is in the atlas
packaging; the RPM shouldn't list a shared lib outside the standard
directories as a provide.
This is similar to mrtg vs. perl-SNMP_Session; mrtg has its own private
copy of the SNMP_Session perl modules, but they are found by the
auto-provides (so the RPM lists them). Then mrtg is a shorter name than
perl-SNMP_Session, so a package requiring "perl(SNMP_Session)" gets a
broken install.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]