[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: OpenNebula package mantainer request



Hi,

Steve: thanks for the info, good to know.

Today we changed some code in OpenNebula and now it's compatible with
the current sqlite-devel package, so there's no more need to use newer
versions of sqlite (at least for opennebula).

The only "missing" dependency now is xmlrpc-c.

regards,
Jaime

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Steve Traylen <steve traylen cern ch> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Jaime Melis <j melis fdi ucm es> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> great to see interest regarding this request!
>>
>> Mathew: thanks for your offer, I will let you know once the rpm gets
>> submitted to EPEL, or even before if we stumble with tricky things so
>> you can give us a hand if you have time for it.
>>
>> Steve: I didn't know you were trying to package OpenNebula, that's
>> great. As you said there are tricky dependencies, especially sqlite.
>> One possible solution is to entirely disable sqlite, since OpenNebula
>> 2.0 now fully supports mysql, so maybe we could remove sqlite from the
>> rpm package and use mysql by default.
>>
>> There is also another dependency that concerns me: xmlrpc-c. For the
>> moment we use the xmlrpc-c and xmlrpc-c-devel packages from the
>> centos.karan.org repo.
>
> There's a new version of cmake well on the the way into EPEL5, this may well
> help with xmlrpc-c being added.
>>
>> regards,
>> Jaime
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Steve Traylen <steve traylen cern ch> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Jaime Melis <j melis fdi ucm es> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> We are about to release OpenNebula 2.0 [1], which is a Cloud Computing
>>>> framework, and we would like to include it in EPEL.
>>>>
>>>> Is there anyone interested in being OpenNebula's package mantainer for EPEL?
>>>
>>> Hi Jamie,
>>>
>>> I am interested and even started doing it a few months  ago.
>>> At that time I got stuck with your sqlite requirement which is why
>>> the following has been done.
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571458
>>> Though since then of course RHEL/EPEL6 is on it's way which
>>> makes a good starting point.
>>>
>>> We also of course as you well know use opennebula where I am.
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Grid_Computing
>>> may also interest you, I've added opennebula it's
>>> wishlist.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If it helps, we have already built RPM packages, so we have a spec
>>>> file that works, but it should be reviewed by actual package
>>>> mantainers, since we didn't follow all the good practices listed in
>>>> the Fedora Packaging guidelines document.
>>> Certainly it helps.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jaime Melis
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://opennebula.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> epel-devel-list mailing list
>>>> epel-devel-list redhat com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve Traylen
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> epel-devel-list mailing list
>>> epel-devel-list redhat com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> epel-devel-list mailing list
>> epel-devel-list redhat com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Traylen
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]