Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Sunday, July 03, 2011 04:20:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > epel4 -> master > > epel-4 comes from FC-3 if it exists if not rawhide > > > epel5 -> master > > epel-5 comes from FC-6 if it exists if not rawhide > > > epel6 -> f12 > > epel-6 comes from F-12 if it exists if not rawhide May i ask what exactly you mean with "if it exists"? Fedpkg lists a remote "origin/f12" branch for all of my packages, so in that sense they exist in F-12, but the el6 branches I got when my package change requests were processed all started out with the same content as the master branch. In this case I would have synchronized them with Rawhide anyway, and then adapted them as necessary from there, so I'm not complaining, but I notice a discrepancy between what I saw and what you're saying. When the time comes for EPEL 7 I will probably prefer that the packages are branched from the most closely matching Fedora release (as Kevin says they will probably be). Björn Persson
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.