I wrote: > David Juran wrote: >> To be honest, I'm not sure. I know it's been discussed on this list >> back and forth a few times but I can't recall the outcome so I just >> pulled the above FAQ out from google... Can anyone else on the list >> recall? > > Heh, I have similarly vague recollections. Glad to not be the only > one. :) This might be the thread we were thinking about: https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2010-December/msg00102.html That means that facter and puppet are violating this. :( They have been doing so for years. I strongly suspect that they were in EPEL before they got added to MRG and no one noticed at the time. I started helping with the packages in Fedora/EPEL around the 0.24.6 timeframe, but they entered EPEL in July of 2006, it appears. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If someone with multiple personalities threatens to kill herself, would that be considered a hostage situation?
Description: PGP signature