2012-February Archive by Thread
Messages are ordered newest-to-oldest in this index. The newest
threads will be at the top of this page, the oldest will be at the bottom.
Within a single thread, the first mail note is the START of the
thread; the notes following that are in the chronological order of
when they were received. So globally, newest messages are at the top,
but within a thread, the oldest (the start of the thread) is at the
top.
If you think about it, it is confusing. Just go with the flow and everything will be all right.
- awn (avant-window-manager) for EL6,
Nelson Manuel Marques
- Mock and CMS,
Nelson Manuel Marques
- Okay to package HTTPS Everywhere 2.0?,
Russell Golden
- Re: collectd & usrmove (iptables),
Alan Pevec
- Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2012-02-26,
Fedora EPEL repoclosure
- iptraf-ng obsoleting iptraf,
Ian Pilcher
- Python 2.7 in EPEL 6,
Sergio Pascual
- djvulibre,
Jonathan Underwood
- Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2012-02-19,
Fedora EPEL repoclosure
- Firefox Current Release at EOL?,
Randall Berry
- hwloc 1.4,
Orion Poplawski
- trafficserver review,
Jan-Frode Myklebust
- Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2012-02-12,
Fedora EPEL repoclosure
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report,
updates
- Fedora EPEL 4 updates-testing report,
updates
- package announce mailing list stopped?,
Steve Traylen
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5 extended to 10 years until EOL),
Christopher Meng
- Re: meetings,
Stephen John Smoogen
- Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2012-02-05,
Fedora EPEL repoclosure
- Libvirt bug?,
Joshua Harlow
- EPEL-ANNOUNCE EPEL4 end of life 2012-02-29,
Kevin Fenzi
- Re: PyPy rpms in EPEL available for testing,
Adam Miller
- Re: announce EOL for EPEL-4?,
Kevin Fenzi
- RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL,
Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL,
Adam Miller
- Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Bill McGonigle
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Ken Dreyer
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Xavier Bachelot
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Bill McGonigle
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Xavier Bachelot
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Tom Diehl
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Till Maas
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Tom Diehl
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Till Maas
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Long-term package versions (RHEL 5+ extended to 10 years until EOL),
Stephen John Smoogen