Major version upgrades - acceptable if in number only?

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:04:18PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 20 January 2012 11:12, Russell Golden <niveusluna at www.niveusluna.org> wrote:
> > I maintain mozilla-https-everywhere, and upstream is going to release
> > version 2.0 soon. I hope. Anyway. If 2.0's only changes are new
> > supported sites, would it be acceptable to push it to EPEL, or should
> > I just use the repo I already have on repos.fedorapeople.org? If
> > indeed the only change is new rulesets, backporting would make the
> > resulting package 1.x in name only.
> 
> I think this would be ok.
> 
+1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20120120/9650e676/attachment.sig>