[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Keep or remove GlusterFS from EPEL-6?



On 05/17/2012 02:07 AM, Bryan J Smith wrote:
> And if they mirror EPEL into, say, a RHN Satellite Server channel, how
> do they know all of what to filter out from EPEL because it's
> conflicting with RHN packages?  Especially when the packages are newer
> than the RHN ones.

Is it possible to create an "EPEL-extended" repo? That seem to be the
logical solution. Keep EPEL completely collision free and push packages
like GlusterFS into "EPEL-extended" that users can enable in the repo config.

That way RHEL customers wouldn't have to change a thing and just keep
running basic EPEL but they (and derivative distro users) can opt-in to get
the difficult stuff.

Regards,
  Dennis


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]