[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fixing Puppet in Fedora/EPEL






On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Michael Stahnke wrote:

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Seth Vidal <skvidal fedoraproject org> wrote:



On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Michael Stahnke wrote:

I (we) completely realize this isn't totally awesome either.  This is
a problem when you have a distributed application that is trying to
support the widest variety of host populations we can.

This request was brought to us by community members, Red Hat
employees, and business partners as well.

I am happy to discuss other soutions/ideas too though.  I am not 100%
convinced my proposal is the best.


I'm less worried about the people requesting the newness b/c they clearly
want change. I'm worried about the people who run rhel b/c they fear change.
I'm more worried about people with hybrid environments where RHEL is
at the core for Puppet. (and somewhat how RHEL 7 could shake out)

Do you consider it ok to not be able to have Fedora agents check into
a RHEL master?


There is a reason I want to move to a clientless configmgmt infrastructure.

I do not want to be hogtied like this again.

-sv


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]