'policy' for multiple versions of same software in EPEL
Dmitry Makovey
dmitry at athabascau.ca
Mon Oct 29 22:22:57 UTC 2012
On October 29, 2012 17:35:14 Seth Vidal wrote:
> > Why would you recommend against synchronization with any distribution?
>
> B/c there are many distros built on that base - and tying to one is
> implicitly blessing ONE distro.
hmm. OK, makes sense.
> And I think fedora officially blessing a rebuild of rhel is going to go
> over like a lead balloon.
I'm not suggesting that Fedora donates to/blesses CenOS builds, but rather
having CentOS-Extras closer to EPEL. I imagine for some, who use CentOS-Extra
and EPEL repos against RHEL* installs cross-listed packages would prove
"difficult".
Anyway, I'm bidding for the cause I have limited interest in: my selfish goal
was to find ways for EPEL to get more man-power to carry on. "Poaching" on the
CeonOS side seemed reasonable. And I imagine situation could be viewed in
reverse from CentOS side where they get some extra help (read: cross-
polination) from EPEL.
I'll stop there :)
--
Dmitry Makovey
Web Systems Administrator
Athabasca University
(780) 675-6245
---
Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem
Woody Allen
When in trouble when in doubt run in circles scream and shout
http://www.wordwizard.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19330
--
This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to whom it
is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged
information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take
action relying on it. Any communications received in error, or
subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed.
---
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list